 |
 |
 |
A Nintendo community by the fans!
|
 |
 |
∧ |
Forum main |
|
 |
Do you think there will be another new handheld in addition to the Switch? Why or why not? [roundtable]
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
So, rumours existed that the NX (now Switch) would be both a home console and a portable, essentially letting Nintendo focus development on a single platform instead of two. While the home console + portability factor has certainly been confirmed, it isn't quite as clear whether this is going to be Nintendo's sole platform moving forward, or if we will see another new handheld as well. The 3DS is certainly on its last legs, so if a handheld is coming, I imagine it wouldn't be too far off... a year or two at most. But maybe the Switch is it? Personally, I kind of think another new handheld is also on the way. The Switch is a neat idea, but it's not particularly easily portable... it's almost more like an iPad than a handheld. Especially in Japan, where commuting with Nintendo handhelds is a pretty big thing, it'd be kind of unfeasible to expect everyone to carry around the Switch every day. Also, this will probably be a fair bit more expensive than Nintendo handhelds tend to be, and there really isn't much evidence that people want expensive handhelds... Sony's have struggled, and the 3DS struggled with a $250 price tag at launch. Nintendo handhelds are Nintendo's bread and butter, and I'm not sure they would be willing to risk that on the Switch as a replacement. HOWEVER, I also think they're probably going to give Switch a small bit of time and see if it could potentially take the place of both. Sort of like how the DS was introduced as something else, so that if it bombed they could always do a new Game Boy. If it's not quite living up to Nintendo's standards for its handheld, they can go ahead with a new handheld. Still, it brings up the question of... if I'm right, how will they present and market and develop for this thing moving forward? Will they openly claim it is a replacement for both a console and a handheld, and go all in on that idea for a bit? Or leave it a bit more vague so they can fall back on a new handheld if needed? What do YOU think? URL to share (right click and copy)
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
10/24/16, 19:14 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
A smaller, portable version of the Switch that plays Switch games? Sure, I'd be fine with that.
But if they make a fully separate, has-its-own-games follow-up to the 3DS, I would be highly disappointed. By far the most enticing thing about the Switch is a consolidated Nintendo library. The portability is nice, but if they do the "two systems" thing again with the handheld having power close to the home console, it's going to really undermine the entire appeal of the Switch.
In fact, I think if they keep flirting with this "a 3DS successor is coming" talk, they're risking confusion on a Wii U scale again. They need to go all-in with the Switch. "It's the ultimate home console AND the ultimate portable." Don't half-A it, Nintendo!
Like I said, though, a smaller, ideally-clamshell version of the system that's portable only (and could be used as a second controller?) would be fine and dandy. Helps grow the brand and make it more ubiquitous, rather than competing with it. And then we won't have to worry about TWO Mario Karts and TWO Smash Bros and TWO New Super Mario Bros games... |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
∧ |
Forum main |
|
|