A Nintendo community
for the fans, by the fans!
 Go to forum index
Zelda Oracles Announced for Japanese E-shop- UPDATE: US and PAL on 30/5/13
News reported by 
February 21, 2013, 13:07:12
From Nintendo Direct: The Legend of Zelda: Oracle of Ages and Oracle of Seasons will hit 3DS Virtual Console in Japan on February 27th for 600 Yen each.

A bundle deal featuring both games will also be available.

No word yet on a Western release, but it can't be too far behind...

UPDATE: Western release confirmed for May 30th!

Source: Nintendo Direct / Nintendo press release

URL to share this content (right click and copy link)
Posted: 02/21/13, 13:07:12  - Edited by 
 on: 04/17/13, 21:03:00    
Why not sign up for a (free) account and create your own content?
Pokefreak911 said:
Lord Jabu Jabu is old man. Like Skyward Sword old. He's as old as Rauru/Gaepora.

Posted by 
 on: 02/22/13, 09:25:35
Quick question: Anyone interested in participating in an Oracle Game Club when these things hit?

Majroa club didn't do so well, but the club for Zelda I and II had solid participation. Maybe it's a handheld thing.

Posted by 
 on: 02/23/13, 01:41:45  - Edited by 
 on: 02/23/13, 02:51:04
Hell yeah. I was thinking about that too.
Why don't we just make an adventure game club in a similar vein to the epic game club. Stache suggested it a while ago and I've been thinking of doing it ever since.

Posted by 
 on: 02/23/13, 01:47:44
The Oracle games are the only handheld Zeldas I've ever played (aside from Four Swords GBA), but they're quite possibly my favorite games in the series, along with Majora's Mask. They are seriously incredible, and I can't wait for them to be rereleased. I still have my cartridges, but it'll be great to have them available for a new audience to discover.

Posted by 
 on: 02/23/13, 05:47:49
@Shadowlink I'm in! Although depending on how long they are, I might not play both RIGHT IN A ROW.

...but I probably will.

Posted by 
 on: 02/23/13, 05:57:32

Whoo! I'll probably start a thread when we get closer to an actual release date. We can turn it into an Adventure club later. Maybe.

I'd say the thread will be for both games and people will play whichever first and then follow up with the other (if they want).

I'd say like pretty much every other aspect of these games, the length should be comparable to Link's Awakening. The structure of all three games is pretty much the same.

Posted by 
 on: 02/23/13, 06:29:55  - Edited by 
 on: 02/23/13, 06:31:07
@V_s I'm sure that's a great explanation (though I thought that the only ones who really get reincarnated were special people like Link, Ganon, Zelda, and even Impa?), but for the purpose of a game, it's more fun to have new characters that make me think of new experiences, rather than seeing Malon and Talon in Minish Cap going "Huh...that's pretty convenient."

Does AoL even have any characters outside of Link, Zelda, and Ganon that are reincarnated? Everyone basically only said about one line of text each. I didn't know the game said anything about people being reincarnated, looking exactly the same, and fulfilling the same role? I'm sure there's a canon explanation for that, but it's still kind of a copout to me.

Posted by 
 on: 02/23/13, 09:00:53
@PogueSquadron - The games have never said anything about any of the characters being reincarnated (except for Ganondorf saying in TWW that he believes TWW Link is the Hero of Time reincarnated, Zelda in FSA saying that Ganondorf is an ancient demon reborn, and Impa/Zelda in SS implying that Zelda is Hylia reincarnated). That's always been one of those out-of-game confirmations that actually goes along with what's in the games sort of things. We know that Oracles Malon, Talon, and Ingo can't be the same people as OoT Malon, Talon, and Ingo, for example, so they must be reincarnations as well. Simple as that.

AoL doesn't have any character outside of Zelda being reincarnated. What I meant was that each of those games expanded on the role of reincarnation.

AoL established that Zelda reincarnates (or at least it was implied until it was confirmed out-of-game).
ALttP established that both Link and Zelda reincarnate.
The Oracles established that everyone reincarnates.

And the Zelda series has been operating under that notion ever since.

I understand your reasoning for preferring new characters, but I think that since we do have this mythos of reincarnation in the series, that it's a great way for the series to mix in nostalgia with originality without doing anything that is actually a copout. Of course I also believe that the amount of reincarnated characters we get should be fewer than the number of new characters we get, but I'm pretty sure that's always been the case anyway.

Posted by 
 on: 02/23/13, 09:42:53
I guess my beef isn't exactly that Malon and Talon always have their roles as the ranch owners, but more that whenever there IS a ranch, it has to be run by Malon and Talon, if that makes sense. I think there's a time and place for nostalgia, but I'm not so sure that always having them as the ranch runners is the way to go. Like I said, I think there's a fine like between a "nod" and "we have to always have the same characters in the same roles."

Posted by 
 on: 02/23/13, 09:48:26
I wish Nintendo would bring back Tingle.

Posted by 
 on: 02/23/13, 10:40:52


Posted by 
 on: 02/23/13, 12:09:48
@PogueSquadron - Well that's not entirely true either. There was a ranch in TP that wasn't run by Malon and Talon. (And if you want to get technical, the ranch in MM wasn't run by Malon and Talon either.) And there was no ranch in OoS or FSA in which Malon and Talon appeared.

Posted by 
 on: 02/23/13, 23:23:23

The fact that Malon and Talon (and the plethora of other characters from the N64 Zelda games) appear in the Oracle games and not in Twilight Princess or Wind Waker is exactly my problem. Why are Malon and Talon, et al, reincarnated in Holodrum and Labrynna, but not in Hyrule? I realize they appear in Minish Cap, and it bothers me less there, but it's still kind of lazy. The fact that Nintendo's in-house Zelda games do this less frequently makes them feel like fan games, or at least a B-team effort. There's already a perception that handheld games are inferior to those on consoles, and reusing characters under a flimsy reincarnation excuse certainly doesn't help.

I don't disagree with you that reincarnation can be used to justify their existence. But it seems like it was just done to have some recognizable characters without having to put much thought into them, rather than to perpetuate the reincarnation themes we've seen before. "Those N64 games were popular... let's use some of those characters here!" Heck, when Linebeck's descendant appeared in Spirit Tracks, they specifically called him Linebeck III and establish him as a different character, not just the exact same role he played before, but mysteriously in a different country with no explanation.

I guess what it comes down to is this: I accept the justification that these characters are reincarnated just like Link, Zelda, and Ganon. I just think it's handled pretty poorly.

Posted by 
 on: 02/24/13, 05:59:10  - Edited by 
 on: 02/24/13, 06:07:19
Bump for the western release date! Everyone get ready for game club!

Posted by 
 on: 04/17/13, 17:38:16
What month is 30? I can't wait that long!

Posted by 
 on: 04/17/13, 17:38:55

LOL! Dumb PAL-Landers, they don't know how to write dates correctly!

Posted by 
 on: 04/17/13, 17:41:52

Start using a proper measurement system and maybe we'll give a damn what you guys think

Posted by 
 on: 04/17/13, 17:43:42

We will once you guys stop adding unnecessary vowels to words like color and old, silly PALers.

Posted by 
 on: 04/17/13, 17:44:46

We didn't add them, you took them out!

Posted by 
 on: 04/17/13, 17:46:05

Because they weren't needed. Howe woulde youa like it if I just threw in unnecessarye vouwels all the tiyme?

Posted by 
 on: 04/17/13, 18:18:16  - Edited by 
 on: 04/17/13, 18:18:32
Browse    1  2  3  4