A Nintendo community
for the fans, by the fans!
 Go to forum index
Chasing Aurora (Nintendo Wii U eShop) Review
Review by 
6.33/10 from 3 user ratings
The launch lineup of the Wii U had left me feeling a little dry on the retail side of things, and in the days leading up to the system launch, my attention quickly turned to the eShop. I had not been following the eShop release schedule very closely, so it came as a bit of a warm surprise to see that so many eShop games were going to be available on day one. Chasing Aurora is one of the five Wii U eShop launch titles, and it had somehow managed to completely slip under my radar until the very last minute. When I learned that it was the next game by Broken Rules, developer of one of my niche WiiWare favorites And Yet It Moves, I was sold. It didn’t hurt that it was a game about flight starring a birdlike race of people. That’s just plain cool.

One of the first things that you will notice upon starting up Chasing Aurora is the unique art style, which is both polygonal and beautiful. A large part of the allure of the art comes from the environments, which range from a fresh spring valley populated by evergreens to a gusty, ice-topped mountain surrounded by mist. Chasing Aurora is certainly pleasant on the eyes, and it reconfirms my belief that, although they may lack the raw tech of the big dogs, indie developers are generally the ones to look to for the most unique and creative art styles.

Bird-people. They’re like normal people, except also birds, and therefore infinitely superior.

The music isn’t bad either, although it mostly works in the background, putting the focus more on the mood created by the outdoorsy sound effects. I’d comment on the story, but there really is none. No context is given whatsoever for who these birdlike people are beyond their names, and why they partake in these games is left a mystery.

The controls are also commendable. On the GamePad, you move your bird-person (birdson?) around with the analog stick or digital pad, pressing the A button to flap your wings, while the R or ZR button will tuck your wings so you can dive quicker. The Wii remote utilizes a similarly simple control scheme. And that’s it, no extraneous actions are thrown in, just pure, unbridled flight controls. However, don’t expect to just spam buttons and fly around willy-nilly. Chasing Aurora is very much a physics-based game, and it requires you to master the rhythm of flight, which has a small, but noticeable learning curve involved. When you do get it down, however, it can feel glorious, and it pretty fairly imitates what birds must feel while flying free. Or so I imagine. Unfortunately, I’m not a bird, so I will never really know.


Everything sounds pretty good so far, no? But there is a catch. Between the excellent presentation values and the sublime controls and physics, Chasing Aurora definitely has the core of a great game inside of it, and all that it needed was the content to back it up. Unfortunately, content is where Chasing Aurora falls short. It’s not that the gameplay is bad, on the contrary, it’s actually pretty fun when you dig into it. There just simply isn’t that much of it.

Tell me this doesn’t look awesome. You will be wrong.

I’ll start with the three multiplayer modes (all of which can be played with up to five players using the GamePad and four Wii remotes), which are really the meat of Chasing Aurora.

Hide & Seek has the player with the GamePad trying to “hide” from the players on the TV (split-screen) for 90 seconds. If the TV players are getting close, the GamePad player will see an arrow on the GamePad screen indicating the direction from which they are approaching, allowing him or her to flee. If the TV players manage to get close enough, however, they will see arrows on the TV pointing them in the direction of the player who is hiding, and can give chase. If a TV player can tag the GamePad player they will steal their “gem”, and if they can keep this away from the GamePad player for a short amount of time the game is over and the TV players have won. This is probably my least favorite of the modes; all too often (whatever my role) I found myself flying around aimlessly a bit too much until I happened to stumble upon someone, and it is possible to go entire matches without being a part of the (constantly moving) action.

Freeze reverses the roles and puts the GamePad player on the attack, in the form of an ice bird that can freeze the other players if touched. If the GamePad player can freeze all of the TV players before 60 seconds is up, the GamePad player is declared victorious; otherwise, the TV players win. TV players can unfreeze their frozen companions, but everyone must stay on the same screen together (no split-screen here) so it requires some coordination to avoid the dreaded ice bird. This mode is not bad, and trying to unfreeze your friends while avoiding the ice bird can be pretty intense at times.

Finally, Chase is the only non-asymmetrical multiplayer game of the three, pitting all of the players against each other in a battle for control of a single gem; whoever has the gem controls the camera (again, no split-screen), and must then attempt to leave the others behind (to steal the gem, simply bump into the player who has it.) If a player is stuck off-screen for too long, they lose a heart; if they lose three hearts, they’re out of the game. This continues until only a single player remains, and victory is declared. Chase is probably my favorite of the three multiplayer modes, and my experience with it was pure chaotic fun, including lots of quick dives by the gem-holder and everyone else scrambling to keep up.

Split-screen multiplayer is making a comeback, baby!

All three of these multiplayer modes are played through various “tournaments”, which can range from a single match to five matches, contain matches of a single mode, or a mix, and take place across several different stages. There are many tournaments to choose from with a fair amount of variety, and even a random tournament generator, yet inexplicably there is no way to simply create your own tournament with exactly the match count, modes, and stages that you want. At the end of each tournament, whoever has the most points is declared the champion. You can earn points in these tournaments not just by winning, but also by how well you played the match; for instance, if you manage to be the one to steal the gem from the GamePad player in Hide & Seek, you will get more points than the other TV players, even though your “team” worked together (in theory) for the win.

These three multiplayer modes can definitely make for an enjoyable session with people over, but if you are home alone and want to play any of the tournaments, you are out of luck. Chasing Aurora has no online and no bots to play against; you simply cannot play multiplayer without other people in the room.

There is also a sole single player challenge mode in Chasing Aurora, but it is pretty negligible. In this mode you will be racing through short “trails” set up within the various environments, trying to complete as many laps as you can before the timer runs out, and I stress the word short; most trails will take you about 5 to 15 seconds per lap. This feels like a bit of a missed opportunity, as the flying mechanics really shine when they utilize the freedom of the wide open areas, while this mode feels very constrained, and flying lap after lap quickly becomes repetitive. I’m sure some gamers will find some enjoyment in polishing their skills and beating their best times, but most will tire of this mode quickly. Supposedly online leaderboards are being patched in to add a bit of longevity, but when the mode itself is lacking, does that really add much?

Why are we lowly human beings chained to this god-forsaken rock? I want to be freeeeee!

Speaking of the stages, there aren’t a ton of them, but there are an adequate amount to keep you occupied, and they feel varied enough. Many stages also include environmental effects that can mix things up, including wind drafts, falling rocks, fog, lightning and more. This creates an interesting mechanic where at any given moment you are battling both the other players and the environment. In one of our Negative World Chase sessions, there was a particularly hilarious moment where Anand kept getting struck by lightning, causing him to lose the gem several times in a row just as he was about to win. Chasing Aurora took it to him, Chicago style!

In the end, Chasing Aurora is a case of a clearly talented developer falling a bit short. The style, presentation, controls and physics are all top-notch for a digital download (I definitely wouldn’t mind seeing this engine return), and the gameplay that exists isn’t half bad either. However, there simply isn’t enough content to keep you busy for long, especially at the $15 asking price. If you’re getting tired of the chase games in Nintendo Land and really need another offline multiplayer game, Chasing Aurora has some neat modes and might scratch your itch for a bit... if only a bit. Otherwise, you may be better off waiting till this one drops in price.

URL to share this content (right click and copy link)
Posted: 12/08/12, 20:14:50  - Edited by 
 on: 12/17/12, 09:34:27    
Why not sign up for a (free) account and create your own content?
Damn, I will be getting a bargain Christmas Day, will be sure to pick it up at that price, lets hope Little Inferno is next to drop. The problem with this is that i now expect most games to go on sale at some point.

Edit: Little Inferno has dropped. Thats 3 eShop titles that I intended to pick up at full price now on sale This makes me very happy.

Posted by 
 on: 12/17/12, 21:02:48  - Edited by 
 on: 12/17/12, 21:05:56
So this game isn't that good at all. The single player is barebones, though I could see myself at least checking out all the stages eventually. Loading times are horrendous, and I don't think this is the Wii U's fault. Couldn't get past more then 2 rounds in multiplayer, everyone thought it was boring and some even expressed hatred towards it, lol. "waste of money", etc, etc.

Posted by 
 on: 01/02/13, 22:50:33
I've only played one round with one another person. It's probably a bit more fun with a full party but yeah: I'm extremely disappointed with it. And the load times are horrid. I thought my Wii U was defective!

Posted by 
 on: 01/03/13, 01:11:17
Well, I guess that answers that question. It really does depend wildly on who's in the room at the time.

I'm not surprised that Gui didn't like it, since playing Hide-and-Go-Tag with two people is almost never fun. How many people did you play with, Mikey? Did you guys unlock any other modes? The first is the worst, pretty much.

Did the controls ever click for you guys?

Posted by 
 on: 01/04/13, 20:02:01
We played hide-and-seek and freeze-tag, both were underwhelming especially to the more casual gamer contingent of the group (we were 4 players). I wanted to do the third tutorial but at that point everyone was trashing the game hardcore, saying I wasted money on it and never wanting to play it again. It wasn't a control issue, I think everyone got the hang of that. Actually, my sister said the best part of the game is the lobby screen where you just fly around. People were just bored to death with the gameplay, and the ambient soundtrack and harsh loading times didn't help.

Posted by 
 on: 01/04/13, 20:06:36
Oh, it's definitely stupid. But it's either the kind of stupid that people around you are getting into, or the kind of stupid that they aren't.

Some multiplayer game experiences are very subjective. Well, they're all subjective, but some are particularly divisive, and depend on the atmosphere of the room. Like, if the group is kind of reserved or down on it, that feeling sort of catches and spreads. That's always been a fascinating phenomenon for me - to see how negative opinions can pollute and color the opinions of others. It happens to me, too. When I read a bad review of something or hear people talking shit about it, I can almost sense how it's modifying my personal opinion. Part of that is peer dynamics, too.

I think this happens most with music. It's hard not to feel a little sheepish and regretful when you champion something, and people are all, "What is this shit?!" I watched part of a Queen concert with someone a couple of days ago, and we were having such a good time, really getting into it. Then we watched another part of it the next day with extra people (and more obscure song choices), and, MAN, it was just the wrong crowd. Everyone was shitting on it and going into every new song with a cynical, dismissive attitude (which I think is such a horrible way to receive any artistic endeavor), to the point where even the person who was totally grooving on it the day before became part of the jeering mob. They were literally fast-forwarding five seconds into songs, like, "Oh, here's another turkey!" It was kind of pissing me off.

Wait, what were we talking about, again?

Posted by 
 on: 01/04/13, 20:28:43
But Chase is the best mode! Didn't you read my review?

I do think that it was overpriced at launch for sure. I'm not sure what would be the ideal price for this game.

Honestly though one thing I have found with multiplayer games is they kind of need to be a bit meaty for me to bother to load them up. You can buy a $5 multiplayer game and say hey, it was only $5 it's ok that it's not meaty... but if you're not going to get at least 30-60 uninterrupted minutes of play out of it sitting down with friends, it might never make the rotation. People don't want to sit around waiting on constant disk changes and load screens and stuff at parties.

Not that I bought it at $5. But $5 is probably somewhere around the ideal price for this game.

Posted by 
 on: 01/04/13, 20:30:09
I tried, man. Everybody wanted to go back to Nintendo Land after the first two rounds...

Haha, I just remembered last night I was checking the price of The Walking Dead on Steam, and my fiancé said "hey, maybe you can trade in that crappy bird game towards it". The hate runs deep.

Posted by 
 on: 01/04/13, 20:56:34
So, like, is this game only really for multi-player use? Is there no singler player "campaign?" I know you said there is one single-player challenge mode, but I take this as something separate from the main game. Is it not?

Unless I'm mistaken.., kinda weird to make a game that can only really be played with others, yes?

Posted by 
 on: 01/08/13, 07:41:53
Browse    1  2